Nutritionists are Bad for You

It all started with eggs.With advances in the analysis of blood it is no
We weren't supposed to eat them as theylonger necessary to wait until someone keels
contain cholesterol, the stuff that leads to furringover before the effects of their diet can be
of the arteries and heart problems. Then thatassessed, and it's here that another myth, the
piece of advice suddenly disappeared whenone that says cholesterol is bad for you, bites the
research suggested that eating foods high indust. It now emerges that there are two types.
cholesterol doesn't lead to an increase in thatHigh density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol helps
substance in the bloodstream. Instead the blameprevent the build up of deposits on artery walls
was laid at the door of saturated (ie animal) fat.whilst low density lipoprotein (LDL) has the
Not that there were any clinical trials to proveopposite effect. The proportion of HDL to LDL
this. The theory was formulated because ofcholesterol is as significant as the overall level in
epidemiological evidence, the study of nations,the bloodstream. Has anyone apologised for the
usually non-western, where the incidences ofprevious duff information that was imparted? Like
heart disease and bowel cancer are lower.hell.
The food industry embraced the idea warmly, andThere's a quietly emerging school of thought that
produced a vast range of foods which weretakes dietary theory away from the idea that
claimed to be low in fat (note how the 'saturated'protein, fat and carbohydrate should be consumed
bit got lost.) Eat a diet low in fat and you'll bein specified percentages. Instead we should be
healthy and slim we were told.eating foodstuffs that have been around as long
Then a funny thing happened. Lots of peopleas humans have. Staples should be meat, fish,
started to get fat. They continue to do so, withfruit, vegetables, nuts and pulses, food that the
childhood obesity being a particular problem.body is designed to process. There is logic to this
Meanwhile, on the Atkins diet, a regime high in fattheory, but still the establishment continues to
and protein but low in carbohydrate, success waspump out the guff that a low fat diet is desirable
had by some in losing weight. It should have beenwhen evidence doesn,t back this up.
obvious that this was going to happen, becauseTo summarise, the misinformation that's been
the nutritionists said it wouldn't do. Not that Atkinsbandied about for the last thirty years:
is necessarily the answer. The side effects, suchEggs are bad for you - no they're not.
as bad breath, constipation and feeling lousy, areCholesterol is bad for you - not necessarily.
well documented, but its record in shedding theFat is bad for you - wrong again.
pounds punches holes in the theory that a dietHere's a better piece of advice: Nutritionists are
low in fat, moderate in protein and stuffed withbad for you.
carbs is the way to go.