Eat healthy live healthy


Is Lobster A Healthy Or Unhealthy Food?

In our modern day, it seems that nearlyurchins. Lobsters do eat dead bait in traps,
everything we eat carries the risk of beingbut humans eat dead fish too! Ask any
unhealthy. Eating fish has known healthlobsterman, and they will tell you: the
benefits, yet some species of fish mayfresher the bait, the better it will "fish."
contain unsafe levels of mercury and PCB's.This is trade language which, when
Eating fresh fruit is known to be healthy,translated, means that if you put fresh bait
yet many fruits are sprayed with chemicalin your traps it will attract more lobsters.
pesticides the residues of which are ofOld bait does not attract many lobsters at
questionable risk. The same can be said ofall.
vegetables.
When fish gets old and borderline saleable at
Whether the above mentioned food items area seafood market, it begins to emit an
healthy or unhealthy is beyond the scope ofammonia smell. At that point, which can be
this article. It does point out, though, thatabout 5 to 7 days after being caught, it is
the debate continues on which foodsno longer appealing to humans. It is the same
contribute to good health, and which foodsfor lobsters. They prefer live, fresh food,
pose a health risk. This article will presentbut will eat dead bait in traps if it is
information for the reader to determine whichfresh  and  not  old.
camp lobster belongs in: healthy or
unhealthy.This last argument against lobster as a
healthy food is the weakest and not based
Let's start with the few arguments that putupon fact at all, but rather on fallacy:
forth the case that lobster is unhealthy.lobsters eat primarily live food, not
There are not many. We've read that onedecaying,  rotting  dead  fish.
doctor advises against eating lobster because
it may contain parasites and viruses. NothingNow we'll look at the factors in favor of
like pointing out the obvious. Every livinglobster  being  a  healthy  food.
creature on Earth may contain parasites and
viruses, which is why any animal-based foodThere are several health reasons that lobster
product should be cooked before being eaten.should be eaten. The first comes from the
Cooking eliminates this risk. One risk thatAmerican Heart Associations Page on Fish and
cooking will not eliminate is excess levelsOmega-3 Fatty Acids which recommends eating
of mercury. No matter how much you cook anyfish at least 2 times per week. A quote from
fish or seafood item, it will not removethe American Heart Association is worth
mercury.sharing here, "Fish is a good source of
protein and doesn't have the high saturated
How much mercury does lobster have? Before wefat  that  fatty  meat  products  do."
answer that question, we need to look a
little at mercury and the reasons it is inLobster is indeed an excellent source of lean
seafood to begin with. The FDA states inprotein. 100 grams of lobster meat contains
their report "What you need to know about98 calories, 21 grams of protein, and only
mercury in fish and shellfish" that "nearly0.6 grams of fat. Contrast that to 100 grams
all fish and shellfish contain traces ofof white, skinless chicken meat which has 168
mercury" and that "Mercury occurs naturallycalories, 31 grams of protein, and 3.6 grams
in the environment and can also be releasedof fat. Gram for gram, even skinless chicken
into the air through industrial pollution.contains in excess of 500% more fat than
Mercury falls from the air and can accumulatelobster. Lean beef contains more than 10
in  streams  and  oceans."times as much fat as lobster. Obviously,
lobster is an excellent source of lean
What can be gleaned from this report are twoprotein.
facts. One, that all fish and shellfish
contain traces of mercury. Two, MercuryLobster is more than just a lean source of
occurs naturally as well. If mercury occursprotein. Lobster also contains Omega-3 fatty
naturally, it is probably safe to assume thatacids, which are associated with good heart
all fish and shellfish have always containedhealth. There are several valuable benefits
traces of mercury. Which begs the question:from a diet which regularly contains Omega-3
are mercury levels in fish and shellfish anyfatty acids. Again quoting from the American
higher now than they were 50 or 100 yearsHeart Association, "The ways that omega-3
ago? The answer is that scientists do no knowfatty acids reduce CVD (cardio-vascular
for sure, as tests for mercury in fish weredisease) risk are still being studied.
not done back then. Regardless, the FDA listsHowever, research has shown that they
four fish varieties that have higher level ofdecrease risk of arrhythmias, which can lead
mercury than all others: shark, swordfish,to sudden cardiac death, decrease
king mackerel, and tilefish. They also listtriglyceride levels, decrease growth rate of
five that are very low in mercury: shrimp,atherosclerotic plaque, and lower blood
canned light tuna, salmon, pollock andpressure (slightly)." The report further
catfish. Lobster is closer to the 5 on thestates, "Large-scale epidemiologic studies
low  end  than  the  4  on  the  high  end.suggest that people at risk for coronary
heart disease benefit from consuming omega-3
Even the 4 fish varieties that have higherfatty  acids from plants and marine sources."
levels of mercury are safe to eat in
moderation for all people other than pregnantLobster does not contain as much Omega-3
mothers, and mothers nursing infant children.fatty acids as salmon, which has the highest
It is only these 4 varieties that should becontent,  but  is  a good source nonetheless.
avoided in the two circumstances just
mentioned. Lobster is not included in theIn summary, lobster is high in protein,
list  of  fish  to  avoid  when  pregnant.extremely low in fat, is a beneficial source
of Omega-3 fatty acids which are healthy for
The final argument against lobster that wethe heart and reduce the growth rate of
have heard is not based on science at all.plaque. Lobsters feed primarily on live food:
The argument is that lobsters are bottomfish, crabs, clams and mussels. Lobster have
feeders and eat decaying and rotting fisha very healthy diet which would be beneficial
that sink to the bottom. The logic of theto  humans,  not  harmful  to  them.
argument is that since lobsters are eating
these things that aren't healthy for people,There you have the arguments for and against
people shouldn't be eating lobsters. Thelobster as a healthy food source. The
problem with this argument is that it is notevidence suggests lobster is a very healthy
based on facts. The fact is that lobsters eatfood choice. Not only is it very healthy, it
mainly live food. Their primary diet consiststastes absolutely extravagant. Enjoy your
of live fish, clams, crabs, mussels and sealobster!



1 A B C 50 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 61 62 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97