Is Lobster A Healthy Or Unhealthy Food?

In our modern day, it seems that nearlyfood. Their primary diet consists of live fish,
everything we eat carries the risk of beingclams, crabs, mussels and sea urchins. Lobsters
unhealthy. Eating fish has known health benefits,do eat dead bait in traps, but humans eat dead
yet some species of fish may contain unsafefish too! Ask any lobsterman, and they will tell
levels of mercury and PCB's. Eating fresh fruit isyou: the fresher the bait, the better it will "fish."
known to be healthy, yet many fruits areThis is trade language which, when translated,
sprayed with chemical pesticides the residues ofmeans that if you put fresh bait in your traps it
which are of questionable risk. The same can bewill attract more lobsters. Old bait does not
said of vegetables.attract many lobsters at all.
Whether the above mentioned food items areWhen fish gets old and borderline saleable at a
healthy or unhealthy is beyond the scope of thisseafood market, it begins to emit an ammonia
article. It does point out, though, that the debatesmell. At that point, which can be about 5 to 7
continues on which foods contribute to gooddays after being caught, it is no longer appealing
health, and which foods pose a health risk. Thisto humans. It is the same for lobsters. They
article will present information for the reader toprefer live, fresh food, but will eat dead bait in
determine which camp lobster belongs in: healthytraps if it is fresh and not old.
or unhealthy.This last argument against lobster as a healthy
Let's start with the few arguments that put forthfood is the weakest and not based upon fact at
the case that lobster is unhealthy. There are notall, but rather on fallacy: lobsters eat primarily live
many. We've read that one doctor advisesfood, not decaying, rotting dead fish.
against eating lobster because it may containNow we'll look at the factors in favor of lobster
parasites and viruses. Nothing like pointing out thebeing a healthy food.
obvious. Every living creature on Earth mayThere are several health reasons that lobster
contain parasites and viruses, which is why anyshould be eaten. The first comes from the
animal-based food product should be cookedAmerican Heart Associations Page on Fish and
before being eaten. Cooking eliminates this risk.Omega-3 Fatty Acids which recommends eating
One risk that cooking will not eliminate is excessfish at least 2 times per week. A quote from the
levels of mercury. No matter how much youAmerican Heart Association is worth sharing here,
cook any fish or seafood item, it will not remove"Fish is a good source of protein and doesn't have
mercury.the high saturated fat that fatty meat products
How much mercury does lobster have? Beforedo."
we answer that question, we need to look a littleLobster is indeed an excellent source of lean
at mercury and the reasons it is in seafood toprotein. 100 grams of lobster meat contains 98
begin with. The FDA states in their report "Whatcalories, 21 grams of protein, and only 0.6 grams
you need to know about mercury in fish andof fat. Contrast that to 100 grams of white,
shellfish" that "nearly all fish and shellfish containskinless chicken meat which has 168 calories, 31
traces of mercury" and that "Mercury occursgrams of protein, and 3.6 grams of fat. Gram for
naturally in the environment and can also begram, even skinless chicken contains in excess of
released into the air through industrial pollution.500% more fat than lobster. Lean beef contains
Mercury falls from the air and can accumulate inmore than 10 times as much fat as lobster.
streams and oceans."Obviously, lobster is an excellent source of lean
What can be gleaned from this report are twoprotein.
facts. One, that all fish and shellfish contain tracesLobster is more than just a lean source of
of mercury. Two, Mercury occurs naturally asprotein. Lobster also contains Omega-3 fatty
well. If mercury occurs naturally, it is probablyacids, which are associated with good heart health.
safe to assume that all fish and shellfish haveThere are several valuable benefits from a diet
always contained traces of mercury. Which begswhich regularly contains Omega-3 fatty acids.
the question: are mercury levels in fish andAgain quoting from the American Heart
shellfish any higher now than they were 50 or 100Association, "The ways that omega-3 fatty acids
years ago? The answer is that scientists do noreduce CVD (cardio-vascular disease) risk are still
know for sure, as tests for mercury in fish werebeing studied. However, research has shown that
not done back then. Regardless, the FDA lists fourthey decrease risk of arrhythmias, which can lead
fish varieties that have higher level of mercuryto sudden cardiac death, decrease triglyceride
than all others: shark, swordfish, king mackerel,levels, decrease growth rate of atherosclerotic
and tilefish. They also list five that are very low inplaque, and lower blood pressure (slightly)." The
mercury: shrimp, canned light tuna, salmon, pollockreport further states, "Large-scale epidemiologic
and catfish. Lobster is closer to the 5 on the lowstudies suggest that people at risk for coronary
end than the 4 on the high end.heart disease benefit from consuming omega-3
Even the 4 fish varieties that have higher levelsfatty acids from plants and marine sources."
of mercury are safe to eat in moderation for allLobster does not contain as much Omega-3 fatty
people other than pregnant mothers, and mothersacids as salmon, which has the highest content,
nursing infant children. It is only these 4 varietiesbut is a good source nonetheless.
that should be avoided in the two circumstancesIn summary, lobster is high in protein, extremely
just mentioned. Lobster is not included in the listlow in fat, is a beneficial source of Omega-3 fatty
of fish to avoid when pregnant.acids which are healthy for the heart and reduce
The final argument against lobster that we havethe growth rate of plaque. Lobsters feed primarily
heard is not based on science at all. The argumenton live food: fish, crabs, clams and mussels.
is that lobsters are bottom feeders and eatLobster have a very healthy diet which would be
decaying and rotting fish that sink to the bottom.beneficial to humans, not harmful to them.
The logic of the argument is that since lobstersThere you have the arguments for and against
are eating these things that aren't healthy forlobster as a healthy food source. The evidence
people, people shouldn't be eating lobsters. Thesuggests lobster is a very healthy food choice.
problem with this argument is that it is not basedNot only is it very healthy, it tastes absolutely
on facts. The fact is that lobsters eat mainly liveextravagant. Enjoy your lobster!